The second difference between the two films is the setting in which each scene takes place. In the Gibson version, the lighting was faded on the ghost, as to create a sad emotion of the ghost. In the Branagh version, the lighting was bright on the face of the ghost, as to create the feel that the ghost was not human. In the Gibson version, the zoom was focused on the faces of the characters only. This put a focus on the emotion and tone of the ghost. In the Branagh version, the zoom was focused on the eyes and mouth or the ghost. In the Gibson version, the camera was tilted down towards both the ghost, and hamlet. This created the effect that the ghost was bigger and wiser then hamlet, and that hamlet looked at the ghost as a higher figure, or someone he was frightened or intimidated by. In the Branagh version, the camera was tilted up looking at the ghost, and tilted down looking at hamlet. The three main deciphering factors of cinematography include camera angles, zoom, and the lighting. The first difference between the two films is the cinematography.
The two main differences between these two films were the cinematography, and the setting. At the same time, however, the way these two films were depicted was entirely different. These two films were very much the same in terms of characters, and the point being made to the audience. 6 years later, in 1996, another version of hamlet was released, starring Kenneth Branagh as prince hamlet, and Brian Blessed as the Ghost of hamlet. In 1990, Mel Gibson and Paul Scofield played the role of prince hamlet, and the ghost of king hamlet. An example of two different movies that have the same title, contain a scene that is essentially getting the same message across, but differ so much in the depiction of two scenes, would be hamlet.
0 kommentar(er)
